Johnson v. Lanham
Johnson v. Lanham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6894
STEVEN M. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Acting Commissioner; WARDEN TAYLOR, Maryland House of Corrections; WARDEN SMITH, Acting Warden; LIEUTENANT RATCLIFF; A.G. JOHNSON, Lieutenant; MAJOR RAY; MAJOR MURPHY; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Commissioner; ASSISTANT WARDEN HUTCHINSON; MAJOR MITCHEL; MAJOR WILLIAMS; CAPTAIN ROLLINS; LIEUTENANT KOPPEL; MAJOR SINGLETARY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-731-JFM, CA-91-2250-JFM)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Johnson v. Lanham, Nos. CA-91-731-JFM; CA-91-2250-JFM (D. Md. May 16, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished