Foley v. Talbert
Foley v. Talbert
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7093
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT TALBERT; D. SWISHER, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7100
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. WOOD, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 95-7221
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LIEUTENANT BOYERS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Samuel J. Wilson, District Judges. (CA-95-688-R, CA-95-691-R, CA-95-765)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Foley v. Talbert, No. CA-95-688-R; Foley v. Wood, No. CA-95-691-R; Foley v. Boyers, No. CA-95-765 (W.D. Va. July 18, 1995; Aug. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.