U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Bradley v. Hudson

Bradley v. Hudson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 1996

Bradley v. Hudson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7078

JERRY WAYNE BRADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALVIN HUDSON; LIEUTENANT BROOKS; D. BROWLIEGH; L. JACOBS, Nurse; CAPTAIN POFF; G. S. FLINT; JOHN DOE, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-595-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Wayne Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Hudson, No. CA-95-595-R (W.D. Va. June 20, 1995).

We deny Appellant's motions for production of evidence and to expand the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.