Schrubb v. Murray
Schrubb v. Murray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6159
KEVIN RAY SCHRUBB, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
EDWARD MURRAY, Director, Virginia Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-94-180-2)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 2, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1988) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Schrubb v. Murray, No. CA-94-180-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished