U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Hobgood

United States v. Hobgood
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 18, 1996

United States v. Hobgood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY HAYWOOD HOBGOOD, III, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-133-F, CA-95-333-CV-F)

Submitted: December 26, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Haywood Hobgood, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hobgood, Nos. CR-93-133-F; CA-95-333-CV-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.