U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Turner v. Kuykendall

Turner v. Kuykendall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 18, 1996

Turner v. Kuykendall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7562

JOHN PAUL TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-1021-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Turner v. Kuykendall, No. CA-95-1021-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 15 and 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appel- lant's motion to consolidate cases is denied.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.