Potter v.
Potter v.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8086
In Re: DAVID F. POTTER, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. CA-94-705-5-BO)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David F. Potter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: David Potter, a North Carolina prisoner, filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have this court order the district attorney and the Superior Court of Wayne County, North Carolina, to act on his petition for post-conviction relief.
This court gains its extraordinary writ jurisdiction from 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1988), which exists for the sole purpose of protect- ing the jurisdiction of the federal courts.1 Federal courts are without jurisdiction to issue writs compelling action by state courts and officials. 2 Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Id.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.