Penner v. USPS
Penner v. USPS
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1715
DAVID S. PENNER; JASON W. PENNER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magis- trate Judge. (CA-93-489-2)
Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: January 16, 1996
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David S. Penner, Jason W. Penner, Appellants Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the magistrate judge's order denying
relief in a contract dispute with the United States Postal Ser-
vice.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the magistrate judge. Penner v. United States Postal
Service, No. CA-93-489-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 1995). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished