Yarborough v. Le
Yarborough v. Le
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7643
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR LE; JOSEPH LOFTON; S. D. STEWART, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7682
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH LOFTON; TED SMILEY; LYNN PHILLIPS; FINESSE G. COUCH, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-774-5-H, CA-95-834-CT-H)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases Appellant appeals from the dis- trict court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Le, No. CA-95- 774-5-H; Yarborough v. Lofton, No. CA-95-834-CT-H (E.D.N.C., Sept.
25, 1995; Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.