Gilliam v. Mungai
Gilliam v. Mungai
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7723
TYRONE DELANO GILLIAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORUGI MUNGAI, M.D.; DR. MEILLER, Psychia- trist; PAUL KNIGHT, Case Management Counselor; KEVIN KNIGHT, Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-3096) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Delano Gilliam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilliam v. Mungai, No. CA-94-3096 (D. Md. Sept. 13, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.