U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Bethea v. Scott

Bethea v. Scott
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 1996
Bethea v. Scott

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7633

ANDREA BETHEA; DEBORAH HUBBARD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

MARY SCOTT, Warden; RICHARD CANNON, Deputy

Warden; AUBREY MOORE, Deputy Warden; LAURIE

TAMKIN, Librarian; DOUG CATOE, Acting

Commissioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1892-2-1AJ)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea Bethea, Deborah Hubbard, Appellants Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bethea v. Scott, No. CA-95-1892-2-1AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.