Rankins v. Moats
Rankins v. Moats
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7256
MICHAEL RANKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7257
JEFF FOSSETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL RANKINS; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D.
CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7258
RONALD CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7259
THOMAS D. CARR, Plaintiff - Appellant,
and MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus
RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7260
JAMES PRIEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus
RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7261
WINSTON LLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; JAMES A.
BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7262
JAMES A. BRITTINGHAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and
MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiffs, versus
RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7263
JEROME BAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A. BRITTINGHAM, JR., Plaintiffs, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1982-JFM)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Rankins, Jeff Fossett, Ronald Carter, Thomas D. Carr, James Priest, Winston Lloyd, James A. Brittingham, Jr., Jerome Baylor, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rankins v. Moats, No. CA-95-1982-JFM (D. Md. July 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.