U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Isaac v. Taylor

Isaac v. Taylor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 1996

Isaac v. Taylor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7382

ROOSEVELT ISAAC, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR; NATHANIEL WATSON; JOE BLACK, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-2O03-3-19-BC)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Isaac, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Isaac v. Taylor, No. CA-94-2003-3-19-BC (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.