United States v. Washington
United States v. Washington
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7059
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY STANLEY WASHINGTON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CR-92-296-1-WS)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for transcripts and his motion for appointment of coun- sel.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Washington, No. CR-92-296-1-WS (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The magistrate judge was authorized to enter the order in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (1988).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.