U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Roland v. Polk

Roland v. Polk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1996

Roland v. Polk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7300

ZACHARY E. ROLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN L. POLK; ROBERT LEWIS; LEON EDMONDS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-905-5-BO)

Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary E. Roland, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, NORTH CARO- LINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and a protective order, and denying Plaintiff's motion to compel production. We dis- miss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.