Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank
Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2092
EUGENIO DUQUESNE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE FIDELITY BANK; JIM TURNER, Bank Official; REE GARDNER, Bank Official; KELLY G. HALLMAN, Bank Official; LOUIS C. ROSSER, Sheriff; SOCIAL SERVICES, Harnett County; ELIZABETH MURCHISON, Harnett County Social Services; MARY ANN STUMP, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; RHONDA H. ENNIS, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; JACK D. BRYAN, Agent, Harnett County Social Services; JACK D.
BUZZARD, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-8-5-BR) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugenio Duquesne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Duquesne v. Fidelity Bank, No. CA-95-8-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1995; May 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.