U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Caldwell v. Ruffino

Caldwell v. Ruffino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 1996

Caldwell v. Ruffino

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7333

BRUCE CALDWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS C. RUFFINO, Director of West Tennessee Detention Facility; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secre- tary of North Carolina Department of Correc- tion; MICHAEL EASLEY, Attorney General of North Carolina; JAMES HUNT, Governor of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-431-5-BR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caldwell v. Ruffino, No. CA-95-431-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995).

Because Appellant has failed to demonstrate the requisite extraordinary circumstances, we also deny his motion for appoint- ment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.