U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McFadden v. US Fidelity & Gty

McFadden v. US Fidelity & Gty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1996

McFadden v. US Fidelity & Gty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2727

MICHAEL G. MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 94-3135-S)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael G. McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Stephen Harrison, Alisa Helene Reff, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his employment discrim- ination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2 (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McFadden v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., No. CA-94- 3135-S (D. Md. Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.