U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Dempster v. Cash

Dempster v. Cash
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1996

Dempster v. Cash

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3003

RICHARD DEMPSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY CASH; REBECCA KNIGHT, Honorable; EARL J.

FOWLER, Honorable; BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, through and by its Child Support Enforcement Agency; CHERI WOOD; SUSAN WILSON; JIM SAIN; INVESTIGATOR #1; INVESTIGATOR #2; RACHAEL STEIN; MARK T. CALLOWAY; CAROL SALIBA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-95-210-1-T)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dempster, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Anne Gibbons, Assis- tant Attorney General, Thaddeus Byron Smith, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Stanford Kent Clontz, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunc- tion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. Dempster v. Cash, No. CA-95-210-1-T (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.