U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Parker v. Whitlow

Parker v. Whitlow
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 1996

Parker v. Whitlow

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7977

JAMES P. PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN WHITLOW, Security; SERGEANT TAYLOR, Security; SERGEANT WILLIS, Security; SERGEANT WALTON, Security; SERGEANT WHITE, Security; MS. EPPERSON, R.N. Nurse; V. THOMPSON, Institutional Doctor; E. B. WALKER, Chief of Security, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-61-AM) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Whitlow, No. CA-95-61-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.