U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Convertino v. Jabe

Convertino v. Jabe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 1996

Convertino v. Jabe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7883

MARK CONVERTINO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Warden, Greenville Correctional Center; JAMES L. GILMORE, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-210-3) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Convertino, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Convertino v. Jabe, No. CA-95-210-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.