U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Ramazani

United States v. Ramazani
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1996

United States v. Ramazani

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-7492

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FARSHAD RAMAZANI, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-89-107-A)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 5, 1996

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Farshad Ramazani, Appellant Pro Se. Vincent L. Gambale, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying Appellant's motion to compel the Government to file a FED. R. CRIM.

P. 35 motion for a reduction in sentence, and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ramazani, No. CR-89-107-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1994; Nov. 1, 1994). We also deny Appellant's motions for summary judgment and for remand to the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.