U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McFalls v. Warren

McFalls v. Warren
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1996

McFalls v. Warren

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7431

FRANKIE DEAN MCFALLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BIRCHIE WARREN, Psychologist; MARTHA WRIGHT, Psychological Intern; DANNY FAIRCLOTH, Diag- nostic Center Director; LEE WEST, Diagnostic Services Specialist; BENNY LANGDON; STEVEN DEZERN, Case Analyst; MEL NOLES, Medical Di- rector; GARY DIXON, Warden; LYNN C. PHILLIPS, Director of Prisons, North Carolina Department of Corrections; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Corrections; PATSY E. WOODLIEF, Chief Diagnostic Services, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-78-5-F)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 5, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie Dean McFalls, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McFalls v. Warren, No. CA-95-78-5- F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.