U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ibrahim v. District of Columbia

Ibrahim v. District of Columbia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1996

Ibrahim v. District of Columbia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7492

JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7493

JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT CEFAIL & ASSOCIATES; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; SHARON PRATT KELLY, Mayor; BERNARD BRAXTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-1170-CV-2, CA-94-1040-CV-2) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 5, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se. Garland Pinkston, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington, D.C.; Cary D. Pollak, Judith K. Rayner, Eleanor Louise Rhodes Phillips, Martin L.

Grossman, OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, Washington, D.C.; Robin C.

Alexander, UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's transfer of his claims to the District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1988). Because the order is not immediately appealable, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Ellicott Mach. Corp. v. Modern Welding Co., 502 F.2d 178, 180 (4th Cir. 1974).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Accordingly, we also deny Appellant's motion for summary disposition or reversal in No. 95-7493.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.