U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Queen v. Brennan

Queen v. Brennan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 1996

Queen v. Brennan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7541

NICHOLAS J. QUEEN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus EDWARD BRENNAN; JOSEPH J. CURRAN, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CA-95-859-WMN)

Submitted: February 6, 1996 Decided: February 16, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas J. Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn L. Grill, SMITH, SOMERVILLE & CASE, Baltimore, Maryland; Jefferson McClure Gray, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Queen v. Brennan, No. CA-95-859-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.