U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Meade v. DOWCP

Meade v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 1996

Meade v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-2585

FRED MEADE, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (93-1526-BLA) Submitted: January 26, 1996 Decided: February 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Meade, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, J. Matthew McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Meade v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 93-1526-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.