Simmons v. Huffman

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7667

RONNIE L. SIMMONS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LARRY D. HUFFMAN; JAMES E. BRIGGS; DAVID K.

SMITH; T. BERT, Institutional Health and

Safety Inspector,

Defendants - Appellees, and

JOHN DOE, Virginia State Department of Health; JOHN DOE, Institutional Health and Safety

Inspector,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-590-R)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie L. Simmons, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Huffman, No. CA-94-590-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED