U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Stone v. Andrews

Stone v. Andrews
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 1996

Stone v. Andrews

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7309

TERRY LEE STONE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RAY ANDREWS, Warden, FCI Estill; JOHN F.

FANELLO, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-94-1177)

Submitted: November 16, 1995 Decided: February 14, 1996

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Stone v. Andrews, No. CA-94-1177 (D.S.C. July 13, 1995). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.