U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Graves v. Saunders

Graves v. Saunders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996

Graves v. Saunders

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7416

DENNIS RAY GRAVES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-264-R)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Ray Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Graves v. Saunders, No. CA-95-264-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1995). We further deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.