U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Foley v. Harden

Foley v. Harden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996
Foley v. Harden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7465

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SERGEANT HARDEN; LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7786

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CAPTAIN HOLLOWAY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ARGENBRIGHT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson and James C. Turk, District Judges. (CA-94-763-R, CA-95-1167-R) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Foley v. Harden, No. CA-94-763-R; Foley v. Holloway, No. CA-95-1167-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 9, 1995; Sept. 12, 1995; Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.