U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Alford v. McDade

Alford v. McDade
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1996

Alford v. McDade

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7339

LEE ODIS ALFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARTIN J. MCDADE; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES B. HUNT; JUANITA H. BAKER, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-369) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Odis Alford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying re- lief in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action and dismissing several claims for Appellant's failure to comply with the district court's order to particularize them. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alford v. McDade, No. CA-95-369 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.