Lane v. Strickland

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6874

LLOYD STEVEN LANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ROOSEVELT STRICKLAND; BYRON WALTERS; BARRY

DEESE,

Defendants - Appellees, and

G. WAYNE SPEARS; LYNN C. PHILLIPS; CAROL

WHITAKER; H. R. BRIGMAN; JOHN WILLIAMS; JERRY

MCQUEEN; L. W. MOORE; SANDRA THOMAS; YVONNE

LOCKLEAR; VICKY CAULDER; JOHN BULLOCK; JAMES

SANDERSON; JOHN R. MILLS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-352-5-F)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. Strick- land, No. CA-93-352-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED