U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Felder v. Moore

Felder v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 21, 1996
Felder v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6519

BERNARD FELDER,

Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner, South Carolina

Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY

CONDON, Attorney General for the State of

South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-287-3-20BD)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Felder, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felder v. Moore, No. CA-94-287-3-20BD (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.