U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Marshall v. Commissioner of Corr

Marshall v. Commissioner of Corr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 29, 1996

Marshall v. Commissioner of Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8548

GREGORY MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; G. NUTH, Warden; T. PURNELL, Chief of Security; KAREN WOULDRIDGE, Case Worker; MAJOR FORD; CAPTAIN WOULDRIDGE, JR.; M. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer I; C. A. JACKSON, Remedy Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-334-B) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marshall v. Commissioner of Correction, No. CA-95-334-B (D.

Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.