U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

In Re: Frazier v.

In Re: Frazier v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 1996

In Re: Frazier v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2879

In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (MISC-490-3-5-F)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Reginald Frazier appeals the district court's denial of his application for reinstatement to practice law in the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina. In addition, he petitions this court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition directing the district court to grant his application.

Frazier was disbarred in North Carolina in 1989, and his petition for reinstatement was denied in 1995. Since Frazier is not a licensed attorney, we find no error in the district court's ruling and deny the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition.

Frazier's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this matter is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.