U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Williams v. Lanham

Williams v. Lanham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1996

Williams v. Lanham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7595

MICHAEL L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; EUGENE NUTH; WILLIAM FILBERT, Assistant Warden; JOSEPH E. MITCHELL; FELICITE M. MORAN, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1100-MJG) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Lanham, No. CA-95-1100-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.