U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Martin v. Pantry Incorporated

Martin v. Pantry Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1996

Martin v. Pantry Incorporated

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2792

JAMES C. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE PANTRY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-319-3-MU)

Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Randel Eugene Phillips, Karin Marie McGinnis, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Appellant's Age Discrim- ination in Employment claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Pantry Incorporated, No. CA-93-319-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1995). We deny Defendant's motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.