Seibert v. Donnelly
Seibert v. Donnelly
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7156
DOUGLAS B. SEIBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. T. DONNELLY, JR., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-94-596)
Submitted: February 29, 1996 Decided: March 19, 1996
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas B. Seibert, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seibert v. Donnelly, No. CA-94-596 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.