U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McLean v. Bradley

McLean v. Bradley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 1996

McLean v. Bradley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1708

ANTHONY LAWRENCE MCLEAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JERRY BRADLEY; MERCHANT ASSOCIATION; LAURA BROWN; EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-886-R)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lawrence McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Leslie Schor, SMITH, SOMERVILLE & CASE, Washington, D.C.; James A. Murphy, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTH, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his civil suit against Defendants and awarding costs and attorney's fees as a sanction for Appellant's misconduct. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McLean v. Bradley, No. CA-94-886-R (E.D. Va. Feb.

22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.