U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Brown v. Dept of Health & Men

Brown v. Dept of Health & Men
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 1996

Brown v. Dept of Health & Men

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2212

RHONDA R. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1564-JFM)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rhonda R. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Braverman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on her complaint filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1995), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (1988), alleging retal- iatory discharge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, No. CA-90-1564-JFM (D. Md. May 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.