U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal

Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1996

Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2812

STUART COLE, Petitioner, versus JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OF- FICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of An Order of the Benefits Review Board. (84-3344-BLA) Submitted: March 12, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Cole, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order modifying the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Cole v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp., No. 84-3344-BLA (BRB Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.