U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Atkins v. Murphy

Atkins v. Murphy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1996

Atkins v. Murphy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6748

ANTHONY ATKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SANDRA MURPHY, Head Nurse, August Correctional Center; MARK NELSON, LPN, Augusta Correctional Center; JULIAN SNYDER, LPN, Augusta Correc- tional Center; R. SMILEY, Sergeant; EDWARD D.

CAREY, Doctor, Augusta Correctional Center; T. REDMAN, Lieutenant, Augusta Correctional Center; J. H. LYLE, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-240-R) Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Murphy, No. CA-94-240-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 5, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.