U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Adkins v. United States

Adkins v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1996

Adkins v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2275

ANNA ADKINS, Plalintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency The Department of the Army, Huntington Dis- trict Corps of Engineers; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-94-94-1)

Argued: March 8, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior United States District Judge, Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Timothy Paul Armstead, CAREY, HILL & SCOTT, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Michael W. Carey, CAREY, HILL & SCOTT, Charleston, West Virginia; R. Edison Hill, HILL, PETERSON, CARPER, BEE & DEITZLER, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. William D. Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: This case is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee. The district court held that West Virginia's recreational use statute, W.Va. Code Ann. § 19-25-2 (1993), in conjunction with the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., shields the United States from liability under the facts of the case. For the reasons stated by the district court, the judg- ment is in all respects affirmed.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.