Sutton v. Federal Bureau Pris
Sutton v. Federal Bureau Pris
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7551
DAWN D. SUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JOHN FANELLO, Warden; KATHY HALH (or Halk), Correctional Officer; KENNETH P. MORITSUGU, Health Services Director; ROLAND E. WILLIAMS, Hospital Service Administrator; BERNORD PARINA, Clinical Director of Health Services, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Robert L. Buchanan, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-1516-9-0JC) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dawn D. Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal from a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to deny his motions for temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the magistrate judge's report is not appeal- able. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The report here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.