U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Hines v. Revell

Hines v. Revell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1996

Hines v. Revell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7669

HOWARD HINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. REVELL, Captain; UNKNOWN SHIFT COMMANDER; UNKNOWN RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR; EUGENE NUTH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-2637- MJG)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Hines, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARY- LAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hines v. Revell, No. CA-94-2637-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 25, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.