UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2500

JIMMY W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; JIMMY A. SMOTHERMON, Director, Directorate for Retired/Annuitant Pay, Defense Finance and Accounting Office, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-353-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anson Rhine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing without prejudice his potential claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2675(a), 2679(b)(1) (1988), pending exhaustion of his administra- tive remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. The district court correctly determined that the majority of the jurisdictional bases alleged by Appellant did not apply to his claims. Further, the court correctly determined that the FTCA claim was not exhausted. Finally, as the court noted, to the extend that Appellant sought to raise a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Nar- cotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), his claims were too vague to state a cause of action. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED