U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Brice

United States v. Brice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1996

United States v. Brice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY LAMAR BRICE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-328, CA-95-701)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lamar Brice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brice v. United States, No. CR-92-328; CA- 95-701 (D.S.C. July 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.