Owens v. Kowalski
Owens v. Kowalski
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7945
ROY LEE OWENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAYNE W. KOWALSKI, Special Agent DEA; NEAL GODFREY, Special Agent SBI; TIM MONROE, Detective Sergeant, Moore County Sheriff Department; SHERIFF OF GUILFOD COUNTY; RUSSELL ELIASON, Magistrate Judge; RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., Assistant United States Attorney; JAMES CRAVEN, III; RICHARD C. ERWIN, Judge; EPHRAIM VANDORIAN STANCIL, Government Witness; ANDREW NEWMAN RICHMOND, JR., Government Witness; W.R. MYERS, Special Agent SBI, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-602-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 12, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Lee Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v. Kowalski, No. CA-95-602-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We deny Ap- pellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.