U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Mears v. United States

Mears v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 1996
Mears v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7989

RICHARD DEAN MEARS,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF THE

ARMY, Fort Lee Army Base; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1504-AM)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 12, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his suit filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mears v. United States, No. CA-95-1504-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.