United States v. Chaudhry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7773
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
FARZAND ALI CHAUDHRY, a/k/a Chaudhry Farzand
Ali,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-14-A, CA-94-1574-AM)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Farzand Ali Chaudhry, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his mercy plea to reduce his sentence and fines. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Chaudhry, Nos. CR-94-14-A; CA-94-1574-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.